Can MicroStrategy Offer a Better Gateway to Bitcoin than

As MicroStrategy (MSTR) prepares to join the Nasdaq 100 and, by extension, the Invesco QQQ Trust—one of the world’s most heavily traded exchange-traded funds—traditional investors are gaining another avenue for indirect exposure to bitcoin. This development, effective December 23, is more than a routine index rebalancing. It signals a milestone in the ongoing integration of digital assets into the established financial system.

While conventional market participants gain exposure to bitcoin without delving into the complexities of crypto custody, exchanges, or wallets, this inclusion also reveals a fundamental tension between convenience and true financial sovereignty—a tension central to the ethos of bitcoin and cryptocurrencies as a whole.

Bridging Traditional Finance and Crypto Exposure

For many investors who have watched bitcoin’s meteoric rise from the sidelines, owning a “bitcoin proxy” through a blue-chip index fund seems like a natural next step. Purchasing a slice of MSTR after it appears in the QQQ ETF portfolio means tapping into bitcoin’s price dynamics through a familiar vehicle. There’s no need to learn how to set up a wallet, memorize recovery phrases, or trust a crypto exchange with your deposits. Instead, investors can rely on the traditional channels they already understand: buying a stock through their existing brokerage, holding it in their IRA or 401(k), and monitoring it alongside their other equity positions.

This approach, while convenient, strips away much of what makes bitcoin unique. Bitcoin was never designed to be just another commodity or equity correlation play. It was born out of a vision to create a peer-to-peer electronic cash system that empowers individuals to hold and transfer value without intermediaries. By design, bitcoin’s ethos encourages self-custody—where individuals hold their own private keys, effectively becoming their own bank. Yet many market participants remain more comfortable with the protections and interfaces of the legacy financial system, at least for now.

From Software Firm to Bitcoin Proxy

MicroStrategy’s journey from a relatively obscure enterprise software company to a “bitcoin proxy” is central to this narrative. In 2020, then-CEO Michael Saylor championed a bold corporate treasury strategy: converting large portions of the company’s cash reserves into bitcoin. Over time, MSTR didn’t just accumulate a little BTC—it went all-in, sometimes leveraging convertible debt to purchase even more. This led to MSTR’s stock increasingly tracking bitcoin’s price action, often with a multiplier effect because of its leveraged exposure.

By late 2024, MSTR had become a favored instrument among speculators and investors seeking amplified gains from bitcoin’s performance. While bitcoin rose about 140% this year, MSTR soared over 500%. Owning MSTR allowed investors to bet on bitcoin through a traditional equity structure, with the promise of heightened returns—and heightened risk.

Why Not Own Bitcoin Directly?

Despite the convenience and familiarity of accessing bitcoin exposure via MSTR shares, bitcoin purists argue that this approach forfeits a core advantage of the technology. Bitcoin wasn’t created to blend seamlessly into the legacy financial system. Instead, it emerged as a tool for sovereignty, privacy, and financial inclusion without relying on intermediaries.

In the crypto community, a well-known mantra is “Not your keys, not your coins.” This saying underscores the conviction that true financial control—and thus independence—is only possible when you personally hold the cryptographic keys to your bitcoin. Anyone who entrusts their BTC to an exchange, a brokerage, or a corporation like MicroStrategy is relinquishing the autonomy that defines the currency’s value proposition. If these intermediaries fail, freeze accounts, or become subject to regulatory pressure, the user’s access to their assets can be compromised.

Direct ownership of bitcoin involves certain hurdles: understanding how to store it securely, safeguarding seed phrases, and navigating the complex landscape of hardware wallets or secure digital solutions. But the payoff is the assurance that your holdings aren’t entangled in corporate balance sheets, derivatives, or strategic decisions beyond your control. Should a company like MicroStrategy pivot its strategy, face regulatory scrutiny, or suffer from internal mismanagement, shareholders could experience unexpected volatility or value distortions that have little to do with bitcoin’s actual network health or future potential.

MSTR Isn’t Just Bitcoin

It’s also important to note that MSTR’s stock price doesn’t move purely in tandem with bitcoin. MicroStrategy retains its enterprise software business, corporate overhead, and strategic decision-making that can influence stock performance. Regulatory scrutiny, changes in corporate strategy, and earnings reports can all affect MSTR in ways unrelated to bitcoin’s market fundamentals.

Moreover, MSTR employs leverage to accumulate bitcoin, issuing convertible notes and using other financial instruments. While these maneuvers can amplify gains in a bull market, they also add complexity and potential downside if market conditions turn or if credit conditions tighten. Thus, while MSTR’s fate is closely tied to bitcoin, it isn’t a simple proxy. It’s a hybrid instrument influenced by factors beyond the underlying crypto asset’s supply-and-demand dynamics

Why MSTR’s Strategy Is Viewed by Some as Superior to Buying Bitcoin Directly

Despite inherent complexities, a segment of investors believes that MicroStrategy’s (MSTR) approach can potentially outperform a straightforward buy-and-hold bitcoin strategy. They point to the so-called “NAV premium,” which can create a leveraged effect as MSTR’s valuation grows relative to its underlying bitcoin holdings.

The NAV Premium Advantage:
MSTR’s stock price isn’t dictated solely by the net asset value (NAV) of its bitcoin. The company’s strategic vision, leadership, and perceived growth potential lead the market to assign an NAV premium. For instance, if bitcoin’s price rises 3%, MSTR’s stock might respond with a 2.7x amplified increase due to this premium.

Unlike a pure bitcoin ETF, where the price would closely track the underlying asset, MSTR’s structural advantages enable it to outpace bitcoin’s gains under the right conditions. This “amplifier” effect means that, in a rising market, MSTR shares may deliver superior returns.

More Liquidity, More Bitcoin:
Because MSTR trades at a premium and reacts strongly to bitcoin’s price moves, higher prices mean the company can raise more capital through equity or convertible debt offerings. That fresh liquidity, in turn, is used to purchase additional bitcoin. As bitcoin’s price rises, MSTR not only benefits from the value of its current holdings but also gains the ability to accumulate more BTC over time, creating a compounding effect.

Offsetting Dilution with More BTC:
Raising capital often dilutes existing shareholders. However, MSTR’s supporters argue that any dilution is more than offset by the company’s ability to use the raised funds to acquire even more bitcoin at scale. Thanks to the NAV premium, MSTR can buy more BTC than the dilution would imply, resulting in a net gain in BTC per share. Over the long run, this could translate to increasing shareholder value, as each share effectively controls more bitcoin than it otherwise would.

Leveraging Market Sentiment and Timing:
Another advantage often cited is MSTR’s capacity to maximize its BTC acquisitions through well-timed issuances. For example, if bitcoin’s price is low, MSTR can purchase more BTC at favorable rates. If MSTR’s stock price is riding high due to market enthusiasm, the company can issue convertible bonds or equity at premium valuations, raising more capital to acquire BTC. This active management style differs from a passive buy-and-hold strategy and, if executed skillfully, can outpace the simple returns of holding bitcoin directly.

While this rationale is not without merit, it does rely on several key assumptions that may not always hold true:

Sustained NAV Premium:
The amplifier effect hinges on the market consistently viewing MSTR as a premium vehicle. Should investor sentiment shift, or better alternatives emerge, that premium could erode, undermining the leverage-like advantage.

Risks of Dilution and Leverage:
Although supporters believe dilution is offset by increased BTC purchases, this only works if MSTR can reliably raise capital at favorable terms. During market downturns or waning enthusiasm, raising money might become more challenging, and acquisitions less accretive.

Amplified Downside Risk:
Leverage is a two-sided coin. While MSTR may amplify gains in a bull market, it could also magnify losses if BTC’s price declines, making it riskier than simply holding bitcoin.

Execution and Timing:
MSTR’s strategy relies heavily on management’s ability to time the market. Perfect execution is rare, and external factors like regulatory changes, macroeconomic forces, or unforeseen events could derail even the most careful plans.

Evolving Market Dynamics:
As the crypto ecosystem matures, competition from other corporates, bitcoin ETFs, or new financial instruments may sap MSTR’s unique edge. The presence of more direct, low-fee, and efficient vehicles could diminish the appeal of MSTR’s complex approach over time.

Converging Worlds, Diverging Goals

Ultimately, the debate comes down to what an investor values most. Those who cherish the fundamental principles of bitcoin—self-custody, censorship resistance, and independence from intermediaries—might view MSTR’s strategy as a dilution of the asset’s essence. By involving corporate governance, equity markets, and the need for investor “belief” in MSTR’s roadmap, the purity of bitcoin’s original vision is lost.

On the other hand, investors who prioritize convenience, liquidity, and the potential for amplified gains see MSTR as a clever financial engineering solution. For them, the complexity of private keys, hardware wallets, and dealing with crypto exchanges isn’t worth the hassle. If MSTR can offer them exposure to bitcoin’s upside, plus the potential of outperformance thanks to the NAV premium and strategic accumulation, why not leverage that structure?

In essence, MSTR’s inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 is a microcosm of a larger discussion. As cryptocurrencies seep deeper into traditional financial markets, the paths available to investors multiply. You can own bitcoin directly, holding your private keys and embracing true autonomy. You can buy a “bitcoin proxy” like MSTR, enjoying a familiar equity vehicle that may even outperform a direct BTC position under certain conditions. Or you can wait for other regulated products like spot ETFs to emerge.

Disclaimer: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. You should not interpret any information herein as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or cryptocurrency. Always do your own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor or other professional before making any investment decisions.

About Chain

Chain is a blockchain infrastructure solution company that has been on a mission to enable a smarter and more connected economy since 2014. Chain offers builders in the Web3 industry services that help streamline the process of developing, and maintaining their blockchain infrastructures. Chain implements a SaaS model for its products that addresses the complexities of overall blockchain management. Chain offers a variety of products such as Ledger, Cloud, and NFTs as a service. Companies who choose to utilize Chain’s services will be able to free up resources for developers and cut costs so that clients can focus on their own products and customer experience. Learn more: https://chain.com.

Connect with Chain for the latest updates:

X (Previously Twitter): x.com/Chain

Facebook: facebook.com/Chain

Instagram: instagram.com/Chain

Telegram: t.me/Chain

TikTok: tiktok.com/@Chain

Youtube: youtube.com/Chain